↓ Skip to main content

Correction: Characterization of diazotrophic root endophytes in Chinese silvergrass (Miscanthus sinensis)

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiome, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction: Characterization of diazotrophic root endophytes in Chinese silvergrass (Miscanthus sinensis)
Published in
Microbiome, December 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40168-022-01445-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yongbin Li, Rui Yang, Max M. Häggblom, Mengyan Li, Lifang Guo, Baoqin Li, Max Kolton, Zhiguo Cao, Mohsen Soleimani, Zheng Chen, Zhimin Xu, Wenlong Gao, Bei Yan, Weimin Sun

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2022.
All research outputs
#14,720,143
of 25,076,138 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#1,572
of 1,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,081
of 479,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#71
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,076,138 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.6. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.