↓ Skip to main content

No rationale for 1 variable per 10 events criterion for binary logistic regression analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 2,312)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
287 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
307 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
404 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
No rationale for 1 variable per 10 events criterion for binary logistic regression analysis
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12874-016-0267-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maarten van Smeden, Joris A. H. de Groot, Karel G. M. Moons, Gary S. Collins, Douglas G. Altman, Marinus J. C. Eijkemans, Johannes B. Reitsma

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 287 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 404 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 403 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 81 20%
Researcher 61 15%
Student > Master 48 12%
Student > Bachelor 34 8%
Other 22 5%
Other 66 16%
Unknown 92 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 7%
Psychology 22 5%
Social Sciences 21 5%
Mathematics 15 4%
Other 91 23%
Unknown 124 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 193. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2024.
All research outputs
#209,090
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#9
of 2,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,217
of 417,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.