Title |
Current practices in spatial analysis of cancer data: mapping health statistics to inform policymakers and the public
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Health Geographics, November 2006
|
DOI | 10.1186/1476-072x-5-49 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
B Sue Bell, Richard E Hoskins, Linda Williams Pickle, Daniel Wartenberg |
Abstract |
To communicate population-based cancer statistics, cancer researchers have a long tradition of presenting data in a spatial representation, or map. Historically, health data were presented in printed atlases in which the map producer selected the content and format. The availability of geographic information systems (GIS) with comprehensive mapping and spatial analysis capability for desktop and Internet mapping has greatly expanded the number of producers and consumers of health maps, including policymakers and the public.Because health maps, particularly ones that show elevated cancer rates, historically have raised public concerns, it is essential that these maps be designed to be accurate, clear, and interpretable for the broad range of users who may view them. This article focuses on designing maps to communicate effectively. It is based on years of research into the use of health maps for communicating among public health researchers. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 3% |
Canada | 4 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
Czechia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 165 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 36 | 20% |
Researcher | 34 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 15% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 6% |
Other | 46 | 25% |
Unknown | 16 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 19% |
Social Sciences | 29 | 16% |
Computer Science | 15 | 8% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 6% |
Other | 52 | 28% |
Unknown | 26 | 14% |