You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A FHIR has been lit on gICS: facilitating the standardised exchange of informed consent in a large network of university medicine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12911-022-02081-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Bialke, Lars Geidel, Christopher Hampf, Arne Blumentritt, Peter Penndorf, Ronny Schuldt, Frank-Michael Moser, Stefan Lang, Patrick Werner, Sebastian Stäubert, Hauke Hund, Fady Albashiti, Jürgen Gührer, Hans-Ulrich Prokosch, Thomas Bahls, Wolfgang Hoffmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 40% |
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 22% |
| Librarian | 1 | 11% |
| Researcher | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 11% |
| Engineering | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,551,990
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#736
of 2,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,919
of 452,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#10
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,030 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.