↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1095 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
819 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-13-59
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tanis R Fenton, Jae H Kim

Abstract

The aim of this study was to revise the 2003 Fenton Preterm Growth Chart, specifically to: a) harmonize the preterm growth chart with the new World Health Organization (WHO) Growth Standard, b) smooth the data between the preterm and WHO estimates, informed by the Preterm Multicentre Growth (PreM Growth) study while maintaining data integrity from 22 to 36 and at 50 weeks, and to c) re-scale the chart x-axis to actual age (rather than completed weeks) to support growth monitoring.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 819 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 <1%
United States 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Unknown 805 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 145 18%
Student > Bachelor 93 11%
Other 90 11%
Researcher 83 10%
Student > Postgraduate 76 9%
Other 204 25%
Unknown 128 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 431 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 81 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 3%
Engineering 11 1%
Other 66 8%
Unknown 173 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2018.
All research outputs
#2,359,415
of 13,183,063 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#410
of 1,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,694
of 148,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,183,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,601 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them