↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of propofol anesthesia in morbidly obese children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Anesthesiology, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of propofol anesthesia in morbidly obese children and adolescents
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2253-13-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vidya Chidambaran, Senthilkumar Sadhasivam, Jeroen Diepstraten, Hope Esslinger, Shareen Cox, Beverly M Schnell, Paul Samuels, Thomas Inge, Alexander A Vinks, Catherijne A Knibbe

Abstract

Poor characterization of propofol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in the morbidly obese (MO) pediatric population poses dosing challenges. This study was conducted to evaluate propofol total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) in this population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Postgraduate 6 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2013.
All research outputs
#3,580,012
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#115
of 1,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,726
of 197,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,479 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them