You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Design considerations of a randomized clinical trial on a cognitive behavioural intervention using communication and information technologies for managing chronic low back pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-14-142 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julio Domenech, Rosa Baños, Lourdes Peñalver, Azucena Garcia-Palacios, Rocio Herrero, Aida Ezzedine, Monica Martinez-Diaz, Javier Ballester, Jaime Horta, Cristina Botella |
| Abstract |
Psychological treatments have been successful in treating chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, the effect sizes are still modest and there is room for improvement. A way to progress is by enhancing treatment adherence and self-management using information and communication technologies (ICTs). Therefore, the objective of this study was to design a trial investigating the short- and long-term efficacy of cognitive behavioural treatment (CBT) for CLBP using or not ICTs. A secondary objective of this trial will be to evaluate the influence of relevant variables on treatment response. Possible barriers in the implementation of CBT with and without ICT will also be investigated. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 307 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 302 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 54 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 45 | 15% |
| Unknown | 75 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 64 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 42 | 14% |
| Unknown | 87 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2014.
All research outputs
#7,096,061
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,414
of 4,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,749
of 196,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#38
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,028 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.