↓ Skip to main content

Bioinformatics in Italy: BITS2012, the ninth annual meeting of the Italian Society of Bioinformatics

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bioinformatics in Italy: BITS2012, the ninth annual meeting of the Italian Society of Bioinformatics
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-14-s7-s1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carmela Gissi, Paolo Romano, Alfredo Ferro, Rosalba Giugno, Alfredo Pulvirenti, Angelo Facchiano, Manuela Helmer-Citterich

Abstract

The BITS2012 meeting, held in Catania on May 2-4, 2012, brought together almost 100 Italian researchers working in the field of Bioinformatics, as well as students in the same or related disciplines. About 90 original research works were presented either as oral communication or as posters, representing a landscape of Italian current research in bioinformatics. This preface provides a brief overview of the meeting and introduces the manuscripts that were accepted for publication in this supplement, after a strict and careful peer-review by an International board of referees.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 31%
Student > Master 3 23%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 3 23%
Engineering 3 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2013.
All research outputs
#14,106,031
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#4,701
of 7,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,287
of 196,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#83
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.