↓ Skip to main content

The impact of a brief lifestyle intervention delivered by generalist community nurses (CN SNAP trial)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of a brief lifestyle intervention delivered by generalist community nurses (CN SNAP trial)
Published in
BMC Public Health, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-375
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark F Harris, Bibiana C Chan, Rachel A Laws, Anna M Williams, Gawaine Powell Davies, Upali W Jayasinghe, Mahnaz Fanaian, Neil Orr, Andrew Milat

Abstract

The risk factors for chronic disease, smoking, poor nutrition, hazardous alcohol consumption, physical inactivity and weight (SNAPW) are common in primary health care (PHC) affording opportunity for preventive interventions. Community nurses are an important component of PHC in Australia. However there has been little research evaluating the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions in routine community nursing practice. This study aimed to address this gap in our knowledge.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 118 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Other 8 7%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 33 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 17%
Social Sciences 11 9%
Psychology 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 39 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2013.
All research outputs
#5,969,137
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,120
of 14,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,876
of 196,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#105
of 301 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 301 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.