You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Utilization of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging for resumption of athletic activities following COVID-19 infection: an expert consensus document on behalf of the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention (CVRI) Leadership and endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, December 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12968-022-00907-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Frederick L. Ruberg, Aaron L. Baggish, Allison G. Hays, Michael Jerosch-Herold, Jiwon Kim, Karen G. Ordovas, Gautham Reddy, Chetan Shenoy, Jonathan W. Weinsaft, Pamela K. Woodard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 16 | 62% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 15% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 15 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2023.
All research outputs
#16,149,689
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,002
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,790
of 479,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#14
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.