Lack of sex-related analysis and reporting in Cochrane Reviews: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, December 2022

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation: 5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 10 Mendeley

Summary X Dimensions citations

So far, Altmetric has seen 7 X posts from 6 X users, with an upper bound of 7,554 followers.

RT @_aacw: Victoria Metaxa is talking about ‘Gender imbalance in research’. This article describes that sex is frequently missing in Coch…

05 Feb 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

Victoria Metaxa is talking about ‘Gender imbalance in research’. This article describes that sex is frequently missing in Cochrane reviews: https://t.co/HwFcRsWJUL #UKCCRF23

03 Feb 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

#PubSaludMurcia Lack of sex-related analysis and reporting in Cochrane Reviews: a cross-sectional study https://t.co/oT96AfGhG4

03 Jan 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

#PubSaludMurcia Lack of sex-related analysis and reporting in Cochrane Reviews: a cross-sectional study https://t.co/667MZGstpe

30 Dec 2022

Reply Repost Favourite

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 3 additional X posts.