You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Aequilibrium prudentis: on the necessity for ethics and policy studies in the scientific and technological education of medical professionals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-13-58 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Misti Ault Anderson, James Giordano |
| Abstract |
The importance of strong science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education continues to grow as society, medicine, and the economy become increasingly focused and dependent upon bioscientific and technological innovation. New advances in frontier sciences (e.g., genetics, neuroscience, bio-engineering, nanoscience, cyberscience) generate ethical issues and questions regarding the use of novel technologies in medicine and public life. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 50% |
| Australia | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 16% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 21% |
| Unknown | 23 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 13 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 7% |
| Engineering | 5 | 7% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 24 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2013.
All research outputs
#7,090,111
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,211
of 3,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,008
of 197,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#14
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.