You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating selection bias in a population-based cohort study with low baseline participation: the LIFE-Adult-Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-019-0779-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cornelia Enzenbach, Barbara Wicklein, Kerstin Wirkner, Markus Loeffler |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 34 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 39 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,326,501
of 23,454,152 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#706
of 2,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,546
of 349,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#18
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,454,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.