↓ Skip to main content

Low back pain education and short term quality of life: a randomized trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Low back pain education and short term quality of life: a randomized trial
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2007
DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-8-40
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sedigheh Sadat Tavafian, Ahmadreza Jamshidi, Kazem Mohammad, Ali Montazeri

Abstract

Different interventions can reduce the burden of the chronic low back pain. One example is the use of a 'Back School Programme'. This is a brief therapy that uses a health education method to empower participants through a procedure of assessment, education and skill development. This study aimed to evaluate to what extent the programme could improve quality of life in those who suffer from the condition. This was a randomized controlled trial. One-hundred and two female patients with low back pain (n = 102) were randomly allocated into two groups, matched in terms of age, weight, education, socioeconomic status, occupation and some aspects of risk behavior. Group 1 (back school group, n = 50) but not group 2 (clinic group, n = 52) received the 'Back School Programme'. Then quality of life using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) was assessed at two time points: at baseline and at three months follow-up. The findings were compared both within and between two groups. The 'Back School Programme' was effective in improving patients' quality of life; significant differences were found on all eight subscales of the SF-36 for group 1. In the clinic group (group 2), improvement was observed on three scales (bodily pain, vitality and mental health) but these improvements were less than in group 1. The mean improvement over all eight subscales of the SF-36 was significantly better for the 'Back School Programme' group. The 'Back School Programme' is an effective intervention and might improve the quality of life over a period of 3 months in patients who experience chronic low back pain.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Australia 2 2%
Chile 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 114 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 21%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Other 10 8%
Other 27 22%
Unknown 21 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 15%
Psychology 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 25 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#5,402,691
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,069
of 4,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,872
of 87,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,387 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.