You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Use of digital technology to give and receive feedback in clinical training: a scoping review protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-022-02151-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Veena S. Singaram, Chauntelle I. Bagwandeen, Reina M. Abraham, Sandika Baboolal, Dumisa N. A. Sofika |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2023.
All research outputs
#15,809,727
of 23,485,296 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,630
of 2,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,059
of 439,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#31
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,296 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.