You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
“Thinking on your feet”: A qualitative evaluation of sit-stand desks in an Australian workplace
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-365 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne Carolyn Grunseit, Josephine Yuk-Yin Chau, Hidde Pieter van der Ploeg, Adrian Bauman |
| Abstract |
Epidemiological research has established sitting as a new risk factor for the development of non-communicable chronic disease. Sit-stand desks have been proposed as one strategy to reduce occupational sedentary time. This formative research study evaluated the acceptability and usability of manually and electrically operated sit-stand desks in a medium-sized government organisation located in Sydney, Australia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 18% |
| United States | 2 | 12% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
| Scientists | 3 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Austria | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 195 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 19% |
| Researcher | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 18% |
| Unknown | 34 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 39 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 11% |
| Psychology | 17 | 8% |
| Engineering | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 45 | 22% |
| Unknown | 36 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,181,672
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,288
of 15,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,315
of 199,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#16
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.