↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of a technology-enhanced, integrated community health and wellness program for seniors (HWePS): protocol of a non-randomized comparison trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of a technology-enhanced, integrated community health and wellness program for seniors (HWePS): protocol of a non-randomized comparison trial
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12889-022-14921-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hongsoo Kim, Hyoungshim Choi, Young-il Jung, Eunji Kim, Woojoo Lee, Jae Yoon Yi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 6 10%
Student > Master 4 7%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 34 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 16%
Arts and Humanities 4 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Computer Science 3 5%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 35 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2023.
All research outputs
#16,566,156
of 25,163,238 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,273
of 16,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,072
of 473,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#299
of 472 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,163,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 472 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.