You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of malaria during pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes in a Ugandan prospectivecohort with intensive malaria screening and prompt treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-12-139 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pierre De Beaudrap, Eleanor Turyakira, Lisa J White, Carolyn Nabasumba, Benon Tumwebaze, Atis Muehlenbachs, Philippe J Guérin, Yap Boum, Rose McGready, Patrice Piola |
| Abstract |
Malaria in pregnancy (MiP) is a major public health problem in endemic areas of sub-Saharan Africa and has important consequences on birth outcome. Because MiP is a complex phenomenon and malaria epidemiology is rapidly changing, additional evidence is still required to understand how best to control malaria. This study followed a prospective cohort of pregnant women who had access to intensive malaria screening and prompt treatment to identify factors associated with increased risk of MiP and to analyse how various characteristics of MiP affect delivery outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 406 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 399 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 83 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 12% |
| Researcher | 44 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 39 | 10% |
| Other | 65 | 16% |
| Unknown | 85 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 143 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 51 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 57 | 14% |
| Unknown | 88 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2013.
All research outputs
#4,116,686
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,021
of 5,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,370
of 194,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#11
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,545 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.