You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Embracing multiple stakeholders’ perspectives in defining competent simulation facilitators’ characteristics and educational behaviours: a qualitative study from Denmark, Korea, and Australia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Advances in Simulation, January 2023
|
DOI | 10.1186/s41077-022-00240-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Margrethe Duch Christensen, Doris Østergaard, Søren Stagelund, Leonie Watterson, Hyun Soo Chung, Peter Dieckmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Saudi Arabia | 2 | 14% |
Brazil | 1 | 7% |
Denmark | 1 | 7% |
South Africa | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 9 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 21% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 14% |
Scientists | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 2 | 25% |
Professor | 1 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
Other | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 2 | 25% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 13% |
Design | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,251,775
of 25,393,455 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Simulation
#106
of 275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,756
of 478,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Simulation
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,393,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.