↓ Skip to main content

Nutritional implications for ultra-endurance walking and running events

Overview of attention for article published in Extreme Physiology & Medicine, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 108)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
28 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
264 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nutritional implications for ultra-endurance walking and running events
Published in
Extreme Physiology & Medicine, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13728-016-0054-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric Williamson

Abstract

This paper examines the various nutritional challenges which athletes encounter in preparing for and participating in ultra-endurance walking and running events. Special attention is paid to energy level, performance, and recovery within the context of athletes' intake of carbohydrate, protein, fat, and various vitamins and minerals. It outlines, by way of a review of literature, those factors which promote optimal performance for the ultra-endurance athlete and provides recommendations from multiple researchers concerned with the nutrition and performance of ultra-endurance athletes. Despite the availability of some research about the subject, there is a paucity of longitudinal material which examines athletes by nature and type of ultra-endurance event, gender, age, race, and unique physiological characteristics. Optimal nutrition results in a decreased risk of energy depletion, better performance, and quicker full-recovery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 262 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 68 26%
Student > Master 51 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 6%
Student > Postgraduate 13 5%
Other 12 5%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 74 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 58 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 82 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,809,824
of 24,717,692 outputs
Outputs from Extreme Physiology & Medicine
#26
of 108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,182
of 425,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Extreme Physiology & Medicine
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them