You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fragmented understanding: exploring the practice and meaning of informed consent in clinical trials in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-023-00884-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yen Hong Thi Nguyen, Thuan Trong Dang, Ngoc Bao Hong Lam, Phuong Thanh Le, Phu Hoan Nguyen, Susan Bull, Evelyne Kestelyn, Jennifer Ilo Van Nuil |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Vietnam | 6 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 20% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 13% |
| Researcher | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 13% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,681,779
of 23,905,640 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#146
of 1,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,044
of 429,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,905,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.