You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dieting status influences associations between dietary patterns and body composition in adolescents: a cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-12-51 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna S Howe, Katherine E Black, Jyh Eiin Wong, Winsome R Parnell, Paula ML Skidmore |
| Abstract |
Associations between food choice and body composition in previous studies of adolescents have been inconsistent. This may be due to the body composition measures used, or these associations may be affected by the dieting status of adolescents. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between dietary patterns and body composition in adolescents, and determine if these associations are moderated by dieting status. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Mexico | 1 | 14% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 22% |
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 18% |
| Psychology | 9 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 27 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2013.
All research outputs
#6,342,537
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#852
of 1,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,348
of 194,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#32
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.