You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of the safety and efficacy of biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Medical Research, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40001-015-0110-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jianfeng Lv, Yazhou Wu, Xingmei Zhang, Tao Jing, Li Zhang, Shifei Tong, Zhiyuan Song, Mingli Wang, Gang Wang, Luxiang Chi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 24% |
Engineering | 3 | 14% |
Chemistry | 2 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Medical Research
#230
of 923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,520
of 272,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Medical Research
#9
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.