You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cost analysis of in-centre nocturnal compared with conventional hemodialysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/2054-3581-1-14 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ben Wong, Mark Courtney, Robert P Pauly, Kailash Jindal, Scott Klarenbach |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 22% |
Researcher | 5 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Librarian | 2 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 15% |
Unknown | 6 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 48% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Linguistics | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2017.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease
#316
of 620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,984
of 242,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.