You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Economic and organizational impact of a clinical decision support system on laboratory test ordering
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, December 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12911-017-0574-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elena Bellodi, Emidia Vagnoni, Barbara Bonvento, Evelina Lamma |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 19% |
Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 16% |
Unknown | 17 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 21% |
Computer Science | 6 | 11% |
Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 16% |
Unknown | 22 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,508,670
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#772
of 1,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,488
of 440,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#15
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,999 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.