You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison between autologous blood transfusion drainage and closed-suction drainage/no drainage in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12891-016-0993-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kun-hao Hong, Jian-ke Pan, Wei-yi Yang, Ming-hui Luo, Shu-chai Xu, Jun Liu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 19% |
| Unknown | 12 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 55% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2017.
All research outputs
#7,508,670
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,531
of 4,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,169
of 366,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#33
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.