↓ Skip to main content

The efficacy of iron chelator regimes in reducing cardiac and hepatic iron in patients with thalassaemia major: a clinical observational study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The efficacy of iron chelator regimes in reducing cardiac and hepatic iron in patients with thalassaemia major: a clinical observational study
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, June 2009
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-11-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vasilios Berdoukas, Giorgos Chouliaras, Panagiotis Moraitis, Kirykos Zannikos, Eleni Berdoussi, Vassilios Ladis

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 40 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 16%
Other 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 11 26%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 5 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,595,692
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#715
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,436
of 123,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.