You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Incidence and risk factors of chronic pain following hysterectomy among Southern Jiangsu Chinese Women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Anesthesiology, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12871-017-0394-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chao Han, Zhijun Ge, Wenjie Jiang, Hailong Zhao, Tieliang Ma |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 34 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 23% |
| Psychology | 12 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 37 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,503,741
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#314
of 1,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,651
of 318,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#11
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,503 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.