You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A meta-analysis of the effect of a dexamethasone intravitreal implant versus intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for diabetic macular edema
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ophthalmology, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12886-018-0779-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ye He, Xin-jun Ren, Bo-jie Hu, Wai-Ching Lam, Xiao-rong Li |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 125 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 16% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 48 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 46 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,503,741
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ophthalmology
#357
of 2,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,741
of 329,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ophthalmology
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,366 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.