↓ Skip to main content

The inflammatory response to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): a review of the pathophysiology

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
73 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
494 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
444 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The inflammatory response to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): a review of the pathophysiology
Published in
Critical Care, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13054-016-1570-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan E. Millar, Jonathon P. Fanning, Charles I. McDonald, Daniel F. McAuley, John F. Fraser

Abstract

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a technology capable of providing short-term mechanical support to the heart, lungs or both. Over the last decade, the number of centres offering ECMO has grown rapidly. At the same time, the indications for its use have also been broadened. In part, this trend has been supported by advances in circuit design and in cannulation techniques. Despite the widespread adoption of extracorporeal life support techniques, the use of ECMO remains associated with significant morbidity and mortality. A complication witnessed during ECMO is the inflammatory response to extracorporeal circulation. This reaction shares similarities with the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and has been well-documented in relation to cardiopulmonary bypass. The exposure of a patient's blood to the non-endothelialised surface of the ECMO circuit results in the widespread activation of the innate immune system; if unchecked this may result in inflammation and organ injury. Here, we review the pathophysiology of the inflammatory response to ECMO, highlighting the complex interactions between arms of the innate immune response, the endothelium and coagulation. An understanding of the processes involved may guide the design of therapies and strategies aimed at ameliorating inflammation during ECMO. Likewise, an appreciation of the potentially deleterious inflammatory effects of ECMO may assist those weighing the risks and benefits of therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 444 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 443 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 58 13%
Researcher 52 12%
Student > Master 40 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 8%
Student > Postgraduate 34 8%
Other 105 24%
Unknown 119 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 209 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 4%
Engineering 14 3%
Unspecified 12 3%
Other 35 8%
Unknown 133 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2021.
All research outputs
#626,548
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#420
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,776
of 417,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#9
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.