You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cost-effectiveness analysis of overground robotic training versus conventional locomotor training in people with spinal cord injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-023-01134-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Pinto, Allen W. Heinemann, Shuo-Hsiu Chang, Susan Charlifue, Edelle C. Field-Fote, Catherine L. Furbish, Arun Jayaraman, Candace Tefertiller, Heather B. Taylor, Dustin D. French |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 56% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 10 | 27% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 10 | 27% |
| Engineering | 4 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,588,315
of 23,505,669 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#261
of 1,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,711
of 424,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,669 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,311 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.