You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bridging the gap to therapeutic strategies based on connexin/pannexin biology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12967-016-1089-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christian C. Naus, Christian Giaume |
| Abstract |
A unique workshop was recently held focusing on enhancing collaborations leading to identify and update the development of therapeutic strategies targeting connexin/pannexin large pore channels. Basic scientists exploring the functions of these channels in various pathologies gathered together with leading pharma companies which are targeting gap junction proteins for specific therapeutic applications. This highlights how paths of discovery research can converge with therapeutic strategies in innovative ways to enhance target identification and validation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 35% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 9 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2016.
All research outputs
#15,395,259
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2,241
of 4,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,747
of 416,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#43
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.