↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Sharing is caring: a call for a new era of rare disease research and development

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction to: Sharing is caring: a call for a new era of rare disease research and development
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, January 2023
DOI 10.1186/s13023-023-02613-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathan Denton, Andrew E. Mulberg, Monique Molloy, Samantha Charleston, David C. Fajgenbaum, Eric D. Marsh, Paul Howard

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#18,047,943
of 23,189,371 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#2,049
of 2,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,341
of 327,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#32
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,189,371 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.