You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review of the literature on the effectiveness of exercise therapy for groin pain in athletes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1758-2555-1-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zuzana Machotka, Saravana Kumar, Luke G Perraton |
| Abstract |
Athletes competing in sports that require running, changes in direction, repetitive kicking and physical contact are at a relatively higher risk of experiencing episodes of athletic groin pain. To date, there has been no systematic review that aims to inform clinicians about the best available evidence on features of exercise interventions for groin pain in athletes. The primary aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the available evidence on the effectiveness of exercise therapy for groin pain in athletes. The secondary aim of this review was to identify the key features of exercise interventions used in the management of groin pain in an athletic population. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 260 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 62 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 19% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 46 | 17% |
| Unknown | 56 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 103 | 38% |
| Sports and Recreations | 47 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 3% |
| Unknown | 58 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2023.
All research outputs
#14,436,653
of 24,633,436 outputs
Outputs from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#303
of 561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,037
of 98,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,633,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them