You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Set up and assessment of progression criteria for internal pilots: the Brushing RemInder 4 Good oral HealTh (BRIGHT) trial example
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-023-01243-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hannah Ainsworth, Zoe Marshman, Katie Whiteside, Debbie Sykes, Caroline Fairhurst, Emma Turner, Ivor Chestnutt, Peter Day, Donna Dey, Louise Elliott, Sarab El-Yousfi, Catherine Hewitt, Claire Jones, Sue Pavitt, Mark Robertson, David Torgerson, Nicola Innes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 78% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 64% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,771,868
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#319
of 1,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,640
of 350,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#5
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.