You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development, scoring, and reliability of the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-403 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel A Millstein, Kelli L Cain, James F Sallis, Terry L Conway, Carrie Geremia, Lawrence D Frank, Jim Chapman, Delfien Van Dyck, Lindsay R Dipzinski, Jacqueline Kerr, Karen Glanz, Brian E Saelens |
| Abstract |
Streetscape (microscale) features of the built environment can influence people's perceptions of their neighborhoods' suitability for physical activity. Many microscale audit tools have been developed, but few have published systematic scoring methods. We present the development, scoring, and reliability of the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS) tool and its theoretically-based subscales. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 181 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 18% |
| Researcher | 30 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 38 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 25 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 18 | 10% |
| Design | 16 | 9% |
| Engineering | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 46 | 24% |
| Unknown | 51 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2018.
All research outputs
#17,687,135
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,384
of 14,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,129
of 193,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#249
of 301 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 301 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.