↓ Skip to main content

Concomitant prediction of function and fold at the domain level with GO-based profiles

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Concomitant prediction of function and fold at the domain level with GO-based profiles
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-14-s3-s12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Lopez, Florencio Pazos

Abstract

Predicting the function of newly sequenced proteins is crucial due to the pace at which these raw sequences are being obtained. Almost all resources for predicting protein function assign functional terms to whole chains, and do not distinguish which particular domain is responsible for the allocated function. This is not a limitation of the methodologies themselves but it is due to the fact that in the databases of functional annotations these methods use for transferring functional terms to new proteins, these annotations are done on a whole-chain basis. Nevertheless, domains are the basic evolutionary and often functional units of proteins. In many cases, the domains of a protein chain have distinct molecular functions, independent from each other. For that reason resources with functional annotations at the domain level, as well as methodologies for predicting function for individual domains adapted to these resources are required.We present a methodology for predicting the molecular function of individual domains, based on a previously developed database of functional annotations at the domain level. The approach, which we show outperforms a standard method based on sequence searches in assigning function, concomitantly predicts the structural fold of the domains and can give hints on the functionally important residues associated to the predicted function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 13%
United States 2 13%
Brazil 1 6%
Unknown 11 69%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 38%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 31%
Computer Science 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2013.
All research outputs
#18,337,420
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#6,291
of 7,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,764
of 192,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#136
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.