You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative effects of kinect-based versus therapist-based constraint-induced movement therapy on motor control and daily motor function in children with unilateral cerebral palsy: a randomized control trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-023-01135-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tsai-Yu Shih, Tien-Ni Wang, Jeng-Yi Shieh, Szu-Yu Lin, Shanq-Jang Ruan, Hsien-Hui Tang, Hao-Ling Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 23 | 29% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 35 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 23 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 35 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#14,974,946
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#792
of 1,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,212
of 351,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#13
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.