You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Role of protective stoma after primary anastomosis for generalized peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis—DIVERTI 2 (a prospective multicenter randomized trial): rationale and design (nct04604730)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Surgery, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12893-022-01589-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean Pinson, Jean-Jacques Tuech, Mehdi Ouaissi, Murielle Mathonnet, François Mauvais, Estelle Houivet, Elie Lacroix, Julie Rondeaux, Charles Sabbagh, Valérie Bridoux |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 14% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Researcher | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 36% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,633,928
of 23,257,423 outputs
Outputs from BMC Surgery
#158
of 1,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,184
of 442,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Surgery
#3
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,257,423 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,346 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.