You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mapping patient pathways and understanding clinical decision-making in dengue management to inform the development of digital health tools
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12911-023-02116-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Quang Huy Nguyen, Damien K. Ming, An Phuoc Luu, Ho Quang Chanh, Dong Thi Hoai Tam, Nguyen Thanh Truong, Vo Xuan Huy, Bernard Hernandez, Jennifer Ilo Van Nuil, Chris Paton, Pantelis Georgiou, Nguyet Minh Nguyen, Alison Holmes, Phan Vinh Tho, Sophie Yacoub |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| Vietnam | 2 | 18% |
| Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,310,176
of 24,192,521 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#260
of 2,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,063
of 438,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#5
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,192,521 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.