You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Health economics of rubella: a systematic review to assess the value of rubella vaccination
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-406 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joseph B Babigumira, Ian Morgan, Ann Levin |
Abstract |
Most cases of rubella and congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) occur in low- and middle-income countries. The World Health Organization (WHO) has recently recommended that countries accelerate the uptake of rubella vaccination and the GAVI Alliance is now supporting large scale measles-rubella vaccination campaigns. We performed a review of health economic evaluations of rubella and CRS to identify gaps in the evidence base and suggest possible areas of future research to support the planned global expansion of rubella vaccination and efforts towards potential rubella elimination and eradication. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
Japan | 1 | 11% |
Taiwan | 1 | 11% |
Canada | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 148 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 28 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 16% |
Researcher | 20 | 13% |
Other | 16 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
Other | 21 | 14% |
Unknown | 28 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 39% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 8% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
Other | 25 | 17% |
Unknown | 35 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,077,913
of 25,046,511 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,569
of 16,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,298
of 197,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#61
of 307 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,046,511 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 307 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.