You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Quality control, analysis and secure sharing of Luminex® immunoassay data using the open source LabKey Server platform
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-14-145 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Josh Eckels, Cory Nathe, Elizabeth K Nelson, Sara G Shoemaker, Elizabeth Van Nostrand, Nicole L Yates, Vicki C Ashley, Linda J Harris, Mark Bollenbeck, Youyi Fong, Georgia D Tomaras, Britt Piehler |
| Abstract |
Immunoassays that employ multiplexed bead arrays produce high information content per sample. Such assays are now frequently used to evaluate humoral responses in clinical trials. Integrated software is needed for the analysis, quality control, and secure sharing of the high volume of data produced by such multiplexed assays. Software that facilitates data exchange and provides flexibility to perform customized analyses (including multiple curve fits and visualizations of assay performance over time) could increase scientists' capacity to use these immunoassays to evaluate human clinical trials. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| Norway | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 21% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 14% |
| Engineering | 8 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 23% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,677,798
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,806
of 7,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,062
of 192,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#31
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.