↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of claims-based recurrent low back pain in a Canadian population: A secondary analysis of an administrative database

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence of claims-based recurrent low back pain in a Canadian population: A secondary analysis of an administrative database
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-151
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolas Beaudet, Josiane Courteau, Philippe Sarret, Alain Vanasse

Abstract

There is a vast literature reporting that the point prevalence of low back pain (LBP) is high and increasing. It is also known that a large proportion of acute LBP episodes are recurrent within 12 months. However, few studies report the annual trends in the prevalence of recurrent LBP or describe these trends according to age and sex categories.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 2%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 79 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Student > Master 14 17%
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Postgraduate 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 12%
Engineering 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 17 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2015.
All research outputs
#4,729,450
of 23,394,907 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#949
of 4,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,667
of 194,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#17
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,394,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.