You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Disentangling concepts of inappropriate polypharmacy in old age: a scoping review
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, February 2023
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12889-023-15013-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sofie Rosenlund Lau, Frans Waldorff, Anne Holm, Anne Frølich, John Sahl Andersen, Mette Sallerup, Sarah Emilie Christensen, Stine Søndersted Clausen, Tina Drud Due, Pernille Hølmkjær |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 4 | 44% |
Australia | 1 | 11% |
France | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 13% |
Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 13 | 57% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 13 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,733,926
of 25,597,324 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,009
of 17,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,661
of 476,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#36
of 401 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,597,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 401 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.