You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A rare case of intradural and extramedullary epidermoid cyst after repetitive epidural anesthesia: case report and review of the literature
|
---|---|
Published in |
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, July 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12957-017-1186-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Haruki Funao, Norihiro Isogai, Kenshi Daimon, Yuichiro Mima, Hitoshi Sugiura, Takahiro Koyanagi, Masaya Nakamura, Morio Matsumoto, Ken Ishii |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
Researcher | 2 | 9% |
Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
Librarian | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 32% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 11 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,652,891
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#244
of 2,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,361
of 284,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,081 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.