You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Edible and cation-free kiwi fruit derived vesicles mediated EGFR-targeted siRNA delivery to inhibit multidrug resistant lung cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-023-01766-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Haoying Huang, Xiaohan Yi, Qingyun Wei, Mengyuan Li, Xueting Cai, Yan Lv, Ling Weng, Yujie Mao, Weiwei Fan, Mengmeng Zhao, Zhongpei Weng, Qing Zhao, Kewei Zhao, Meng Cao, Jing Chen, Peng Cao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 62% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 14% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#14,787,281
of 23,664,651 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#534
of 1,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,609
of 434,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#8
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,664,651 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,545 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.