↓ Skip to main content

SPECtre: a spectral coherence-­based classifier of actively translated transcripts from ribosome profiling sequence data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SPECtre: a spectral coherence-­based classifier of actively translated transcripts from ribosome profiling sequence data
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12859-016-1355-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sang Y. Chun, Caitlin M. Rodriguez, Peter K. Todd, Ryan E. Mills

Abstract

Active protein translation can be assessed and measured using ribosome profiling sequencing strategies. Prevailing analytical approaches applied to this technology make use of sequence fragment length profiling or reading frame occupancy enrichment to differentiate between active translation and background noise, however they do not consider additional characteristics inherent to the technology which limits their overall accuracy. Here, we present an analytical tool that models the overall tri-nucleotide periodicity of ribosomal occupancy using a classifier based on spectral coherence. Our software, SPECtre, examines the relationship of normalized ribosome profiling read coverage over a rolling series of windows along a transcript relative to an idealized reference signal without the matched requirement of mRNA-Seq. A comparison of SPECtre against previously published methods on existing data shows a marked improvement in accuracy for detecting active translation and exhibits overall high accuracy at a low false discovery rate. In addition, SPECtre performs comparably to a recently published method similarly based on spectral coherence, however with reduced runtime and memory requirements. SPECtre is available as an open source software package at https://github.com/mills-lab/spectreok .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 30%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 23%
Computer Science 4 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2017.
All research outputs
#18,483,671
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#6,335
of 7,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#303,570
of 415,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#83
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.