You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Regional extracellular volume within late gadolinium enhancement-positive myocardium to differentiate cardiac sarcoidosis from myocarditis of other etiology: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, February 2023
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12968-023-00918-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Julia Treiber, Dijana Novak, Ulrich Fischer-Rasokat, Jan Sebastian Wolter, Steffen Kriechbaum, Maren Weferling, Beatrice von Jeinsen, Andreas Hain, Andreas J. Rieth, Tamo Siemons, Till Keller, Christian W. Hamm, Andreas Rolf |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 38% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 8% |
Italy | 1 | 8% |
India | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 23% |
Scientists | 2 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 2 | 22% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 11% |
Researcher | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 33% |
Computer Science | 1 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,437,444
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#272
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,308
of 478,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.