↓ Skip to main content

Body weight status and cardiovascular risk factors in adults by frequency of candy consumption

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
24 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Body weight status and cardiovascular risk factors in adults by frequency of candy consumption
Published in
Nutrition Journal, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-12-53
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary M Murphy, Leila M Barraj, Xiaoyu Bi, Nicolas Stettler

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limited information is available regarding the impact of candy consumption on health. The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between typical frequency of candy consumption and body weight status and select cardiovascular risk factors among adults in the United States. METHODS: Using data collected in the 2003--2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES), adults were categorized as infrequent (<= 3 eating occasions [EO]/month), moderate (> 3 EO/month and <= 3.5 EO/week), or frequent (> 3.5 EO/week) candy consumers based on the combined frequency of chocolate and other candy consumption over the previous 12 months. Weight and adiposity status were analyzed using logistic regression models, and blood pressure, lipids, and insulin sensitivity were analyzed using linear regression models. Models were adjusted for age, sex and race/ethnicity, and also for additional covariates with potential associations with the outcomes. Appropriate statistical weights were used to yield results generalizable to the US population. RESULTS: Frequency of candy consumption was not associated with the risk of obesity, overweight/obesity, elevated waist circumference, elevated skinfold thickness, blood pressure, low density lipoprotein (LDL) or high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, or insulin resistance. Increased frequency of candy consumption was associated with higher energy intakes and higher energy adjusted intakes of carbohydrates, total sugars and added sugars, total fat, saturated fatty acids and monounsaturated fatty acids (p < 0.05), and lower adjusted intakes of protein and cholesterol (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Increased frequency of candy consumption among adults in the United States was not associated with objective measures of adiposity or select cardiovascular risk factors, despite associated dietary differences. Given the cross-sectional study design, however, it cannot be concluded that candy consumption does not cause obesity or untoward levels of cardiovascular risk markers. The lack of an association between frequency of candy consumption and cardiovascular risk factors could be due to reduced intake of candy among the overweight due to dieting or a health professional's recommendations. Additionally, it is important to note that the analysis was based on frequency of candy consumption and not amount of candy consumed. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm the lack of associations between frequency of candy consumption and cardiovascular risk factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 17%
Student > Bachelor 13 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 6 8%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 16%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2022.
All research outputs
#468,533
of 24,570,543 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#146
of 1,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,144
of 196,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#2
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,570,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.