You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inhaled amikacin for pneumonia treatment and dissemination prevention: an experimental model of severe monolateral Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-023-04331-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ana Motos, Hua Yang, Gianluigi Li Bassi, Minlan Yang, Andrea Meli, Denise Battaglini, Roberto Cabrera, Joaquim Bobi, Francesco Pagliara, Gerard Frigola, Marta Camprubí-Rimblas, Laia Fernández-Barat, Montserrat Rigol, Antoni Ferrer-Segarra, Kasra Kiarostami, Daniel Martinez, David P. Nicolau, Antonio Artigas, Paolo Pelosi, Jordi Vila, Antoni Torres |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 9% |
| Italy | 2 | 9% |
| Kazakhstan | 1 | 5% |
| Vietnam | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
| Librarian | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,053,365
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,816
of 6,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,500
of 494,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#61
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 494,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.